THE IMITATION GAME: In-house Counsel in Fashion and Intellectual Property

 

 

THE IMITATION GAME: Fashion and Intellectual Property

Arwant Kang

Gurkamal Dhaliwal

Jordan Paul

Irindeep Sidhu

Taahaa Patel

 

PART I-INTRO

  • INTRODUCING THE INDUSTRY- fashion industry and the lack of IP protection
    • IP protection
    • Introducing IP concepts
  • Introducing in house counsel/fashion lawyers

 

PART II- JURISPRUDENCE

  • Supreme v supreme italia
  • Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc
  • Christian loubutin vs Amazon
  • CAR-FRESHNER Corporation and Julius Sämann Ltd., v. Balenciaga America, Inc., 1:18-cv-09629 (SDNY)
  • Ariana Grande-Butera v. Forever 21, Inc., and Riley Rose LLC, 2:19-cv-07600 (C.D.Cal.)
  • Kardashian and old navy
  • David Liebensohn v. Kimsaprincess, Inc.; and Kim Kardashian West, 5:19-cv-00137 (W.D. Okla.)
  • Yoga Smoga LLC et al v. Guess? IP Holder L.P., 1:19-cv-07974 SDNY). 
  • Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. ALO, LLC, 2:19-cv-06897 (C.D. Cal.).
  • New Balance Athletics Incorporated v. Authentic Brands Group et al, 1:19-cv-11792 (D. Mass).
  • Shandong Honghui Food Machinery Co., Ltd dba Seven Style, a China Limited Company, v. Wouldn’t It Be Nice LLC, 2:19-cv-07347 (C.D.Cal).
  • Allbirds, Inc. v. Giesswein Walkwaren AG et al, 3:19-cv-05638 (N.D. Cal.).
  • Hypebeast Hong Kong Limited v. Anand, 1:19-cv-08338 (S.D.N.Y.) 
  • Patagonia, Inc. v. Kimberly McHugh, 2:19-cv-07666 (C.D.Cal.).
  • Steve Madden, Ltd., v. Yves Saint Laurent, 1:18-cv-07592 (SDNY).
  • Levi Strauss & Co., v. Yves Saint Laurent America, 3:18-cv-06977 (N.D.Cal.).
  • Puma SE v. Forever 21, Inc., 2:17-cv-02523 (C.D. Cal). 
  • Converse v. ITC and Sketchers, New Balance, et al. (Fed. Cir. 2018).
  • ADIDAS
    • yeezy copyright registration
    • Adidas and J Crew
    • Japanese trademark board and adidas
    • Adidas and skechers

 

PART III: CHALLENGES

  • Protecting branding that barely exists
  • Street Style photography copyright
  • Challenges of in house fashion lawyers

 

PART IV : RESPONSIBILITIES OF IN HOUSE

  • Job postings

 

PART V: CASE STUDIES

  • CASE STUDIES
    • Louise firestone
    • Barbara Kolsun
    • Katie Jamieson
  • INTERVIEWS
    • Kieran Moore- Lululemon
    • Jasmine Ostad- Herschel Supply Co.

 

PART VI: CONCLUSION

  • In house vs Law firms- companies drawing top talent
  • Discussion Questions
    • Ethical concerns- what would you do as in-house counsel when a business’ outsourcing is good for business, but may have ethical labour concerns?

 

    • Do you think North America should follow France and Italy in creating designer specific protection? How would this affect in-house lawyers?

 

    • Companies are being DECENTRALIZED since it promotes local engagement, do you think iin-house counsel should be pushing for more centralization of companies under a corporate policy, or is the current system of putting out fires good enough?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *